tough be honest only 8 bit and 32 bit color is confusable with he per pixel variant. This should be considered legacy as its nomenclature clashes with the newer one. The only time this model is generally used is when talking of indexed color formats or monitor color mode. The older model describes total memory usage per pixel. An older total bits per pixel, and a newer colors per channel. There are 2 ways to describe color depth. But clearly it mostly depends on the result you expect while painting. 16 bits may matter (and some editors may hide it from you), linear color spaces can be really great and they need 16 bit, also it produces much less banding due to math on smudging paint methods to mimic wet techniques. Particularly I answered a question about painting here that can answer a lot of doubts: Particularly by being "transparent" about how things are done Krita works in a way completely different from Photoshop (and it is good, you get to learn a lot! Maybe it will cut a lot of work needed to get familiar with weird color mixing and " magic"). This discussion was somewhat vague as I myself had near zero experience with digital painting. And most importantly, any advantage in sRGB color space work. I've noticed that working in a floating point precision is important for HDR paint, but apart from it I'm still not sure if there exist any advantage. Sorry for all the questions, but much simpler to answer for someone who knows than to read every bit of pertaining material.I'm starting in digital paint and I cant figure if it would be better to work in a 16 or 32 floating point bit rate depth, or even neither? So does that mid-tone eyedropper tool in the Curves layer effectively determine how much Red, Green, and Blue need to be compensated to make the point you selected grey and then effectively apply a gradual curve, zeroing out at the RGB values of 0 and 255? Regardless of approach, would it be better to choose a point somewhere at the peak of its level distribution?Īlso, wouldn't the proper way to describe this then be to say to select a part of the image which you imagine SHOULD fall somewhere in the greyscale spectrum (not which actually does)? I'm also not therefore sure how creating that 50% grey layer helps you blindly find a desirable point (and quite honestly doesn't even seem to be very effective for me - at least not better than going by eye).Īnother scenario: what if there is no part of the image which would actually be grey? >.< I'm just not familiar with these particular Photoshop tools and what exactly they're doing to understand the basis for why this is the process for achieving a neutral color temperature.Īlright, that's what I concluded.
Just some information as to my background/knowledge: I understand all the technical aspects behind a digital image and any relevant camera and/or color adjustment/calibration terms. Obviously I can blindly just do this to achieve the result, but it would be nice to actually know what's going on.
#Krita vs photoshop 2016 how to#
"neutral"? If so, why wouldn't the instructions be (if doing it by eye) to find it in the darker parts of the image? Also, if that's what you'd be doing, and somehow it knows how to properly do the distribution curve for the entire spectrum of the image, couldn't this process actually be a completely automated function? Some enlightenment on what I imagine is actually rather basic would be very liberating and certainly appreciated XD Using the threshold layer, you're simply using it to find the darkest part of the image that's. I'm a little confused as to why these would bring the same results and what exactly is meant by neutral? By neutral, do you mean click on an area where the average of the R, G, and B values are ~127 or anywhere on the image that's actually grey (as in, R, G, and B all have the same value)? Neither fully makes sense to me, and the method using the 50% grey layer confuses me even more. It works on extreme WB problem images as well. I personally find the above exercise a bit of a waste, as you can nearly always get a better result doing it by eye.
#Krita vs photoshop 2016 plus#
Plus 1 for using the middle 'neutral' eye dropper in a curves layer.
0 kommentar(er)
